20.09.2023

Proposed Privacy Act amendments – What you need to know about indirect personal data collection

A new Privacy Amendment Bill was recently introduced to Parliament.  The Bill proposes to insert a new Information Privacy Principle (IPP) 3A into the Privacy Act 2020, which would impose additional obligations on those who indirectly collect personal information about individuals. 

The key purpose of the change, according to the explanatory note in the Bill, is “to improve transparency for individuals about the collection of their personal information and better enable individuals to exercise their privacy rights”. 

Privacy legislation refers to those who collect personal information about individuals as “agencies” and we use that terminology in this article. 

What changes are proposed?

Privacy legislation (in particular the existing IPP 3) already obliges agencies who collect personal information directly from an individual to notify certain things to that individual.  The proposed IPP 3A would extend this requirement so that agencies which collect personal information indirectly would also be subject to similar obligations. 

The new IPP 3A would apply to:

  • all agencies (including natural persons and public and private organisations) which collect personal information about an individual from sources other than directly from the individual concerned,
  • but only in respect of personal information collected on and after 1 June 2025 (i.e. it would not apply retrospectively).

An agency to which the proposed IPP 3A applies will need to ensure that the individual about whom information is collected is made aware of:

  • the fact that the information has been collected;
  • the purpose for which the information has been collected;
  • the intended recipients of the information;
  • the name and address of the agency that has collected the information and any agency holding the information;
  • if the collection of the information is authorised or required by or under law, the particular law under which the collection of the information is authorised or required; and
  • the individual’s right to access and correct information.

What exceptions are available? 

There are a number of exceptions available which permit non-compliance with IPP 3A.  Most importantly, an agency does not need to take the above steps if the individual concerned has previously been made aware of the matters noted above.  For example, the exception may apply if an agency indirectly collects information about an individual from a third party, and that third party has previously notified the individual (in an adequate manner) that his or her information will be disclosed to the agency and also as to the matters noted above. 

There are also some further exceptions, some of which are similar to those that apply in respect to IPP 3, and some which are additional grounds available for IPP 3A only.  For example, an agency does not need to comply with IPP 3A if the agency believes on reasonable grounds that: 

  • the information being collected indirectly is publicly available;
  • compliance would reveal a trade secret; or
  • informing the individual concerned of the matters specified in IPP 3A would cause a serious threat to public health or safety, or to the health or safety of another individual.

What does this mean for you?

If the Bill is passed into law, agencies will need to consider their information collection processes.  This could include considering what steps can be taken to make individuals aware that their personal information is being collected indirectly.  If information is collected through an intermediary, a key question will be does the individual concerned know? 

The proposed changes may also lead agencies to review their contractual arrangements with such third parties to ensure privacy obligations are considered.  Privacy policies would need to be reviewed to ensure they clearly state what indirect sources are being used to collect personal information and to whom personal information will be disclosed.  

If you have any questions or wish to find out more information about these proposed changes, please contact our Business Advice Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry. 

 

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
My cross-lease neighbour wants me to consent to their extension. Can I refuse?
From time to time a cross-lease property owner may be asked by their cross-lease neighbour for their consent to specific matters, such as proposed structural alterations or additions to their neighbou...
25.06.2024 Posted in Property
Contract stock edit
I have a land covenant (or an easement) registered on my title that restricts the use of my land. Can I get this removed?
Where land is subject to covenants and easements, owners might find themselves in a position where they are unintentionally or unknowingly in breach of a covenant or easement or have purchased land th...
25.06.2024 Posted in Property
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.