24.04.2015

New Director and Disclosure Requirements for New Zealand Companies

New director residency requirements are about to be introduced for all New Zealand Companies.  These changes come into effect on 1 May 2015, with all existing companies having an additional 180 days to comply with the new requirements (so by 28 October 2015).
Specifically, the New Zealand Companies Act 1993 will require companies incorporated in New Zealand to have at least one director who lives in either:

  1. New Zealand; or
  2. an enforcement country.

Enforcement countries are determined by the regulations. Currently, the only listed enforcement country is Australia.  Directors who are resident in an enforcement country must also be a director of a registered company (excluding a branch of an overseas company) in that country.  Details of the company will need to be provided to the Companies Office.  This will include the company’s registered name, number or identifier (if any) along with its address for service and registered office address.

Other changes include the requirement for directors to disclose their date and place of birth to the Companies Registrar (this will not be made publically viewable).  Companies will also be required to disclose, where applicable, information about their ultimate holding company (a body corporate that is the holding company of the company and is not a subsidiary of any other body corporate).  Information to be provided includes its name, country of registration, registration number, registered office and any other prescribed information.  There are also ongoing disclosure requirements relating to any changes to the ultimate holding company. Companies incorporated from 1 May 2015 onwards will need to meet all of these requirements.

Companies incorporated before 1 May 2015 will need to provide the date and place of birth of their directors, as well as details of their ultimate holding company information (if applicable), from 1 July 2015 onwards when they file their annual return.

Failure to comply with the requirements outlined may result in your company being removed from the New Zealand Companies Register.

Hesketh Henry can assist with the filing of the relevant required corporate documents for director appointments and implement measures to mitigate the liability which the NZ resident director will incur as a result of their appointment.  For more information about the new requirements, or to discuss any aspect of New Zealand company law, please contact:

Erich Bachmann       erich.bachmann@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8709
Kate Telford              kate.telford@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 7630
Chris Lee                   christopher.lee@heskethhenry.co.nz or +64 9 375 8690

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
My cross-lease neighbour wants me to consent to their extension. Can I refuse?
From time to time a cross-lease property owner may be asked by their cross-lease neighbour for their consent to specific matters, such as proposed structural alterations or additions to their neighbou...
25.06.2024 Posted in Property
Contract stock edit
I have a land covenant (or an easement) registered on my title that restricts the use of my land. Can I get this removed?
Where land is subject to covenants and easements, owners might find themselves in a position where they are unintentionally or unknowingly in breach of a covenant or easement or have purchased land th...
25.06.2024 Posted in Property
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.