16.08.2023

“For every dollar a Pākehā man makes…” – the latest development in addressing gender and ethnicity pay gaps

Mandatory reporting systems that would require businesses to report their gender pay gap might be on the (distant) horizon.

In March 2022, the Parliamentary Education and Workforce Committee recommended that the Government develop pay transparency measures as part of their report on pay transparency.  In the same year, research had shown there was around a 9% difference between men’s and women’s earnings, and that the gap was usually unexplained.  Pay gaps were also observed between ethnic groups and for people with disabilities. 

This report and recommendation came one year after the infamous Pacific Pay Gap Inquiry Report, which found that for every dollar a Pākehā man made in 2021, Pākehā women earned 89 cents, while Māori men earned 86 cents, and Māori women and Pasifika men earned 81 cents.  The earnings for Pasifika women were reportedly the lowest, at 75 cents.

The Government has recently announced that it intends to implement mandatory pay reporting systems which would at first require businesses with more than 250 employees to publicly report their gender pay gap, and later those with more than 100 employees.

Legislation to address the issue of gender pay gaps (and implement any such reporting system) is likely a while away.  It has not yet been drafted, and although on the Government’s agenda, progress will not be made before the upcoming election.  Additionally, there are of course no guarantees of its fate after the election.

However, the issue is longstanding and has been described as having “remained stubbornly” at the same level for the last decade.  Action is clearly needed to make progress in this space, and interest groups have certainly been turning up the pressure for change.

The next phase for the intended legislation is public consultation.  The Government has indicated that, in addition to gender, it is also interested in addressing ethnicity pay gaps, and would like wide ranging input from stakeholders.  At this stage, it does not seem that the legislation will address disparities for people with disabilities, although this could change.

Whether legislation will indeed come to fruition, it is worth watching this space for any further developments.  We will keep you updated!

If you have any questions about gender and ethnicity pay gaps in the workplace, please get in touch with our Employment Law Team or your usual contact at Hesketh Henry.

Disclaimer:  The information contained in this article is current at the date of publishing and is of a general nature.  It should be used as a guide only and not as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be sought where required.

Do you need expert legal advice?
Contact the expert team at Hesketh Henry.
Kerry
Media contact - Kerry Browne
Please contact Kerry with any media enquiries and with any questions related to marketing or sponsorships on +64 9 375 8747 or via email.

Related Articles / Insights & Opinion

Knowing your limits: High Court confirms liability caps in engineering consultancy agreements are consistent with Building Act duties
Design errors in a construction project can result in millions of dollars in loss.  Standard form consultancy agreements typically limit the amount that can be recovered for such errors.  The cap on...
09.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
glenn carstens peters npxXWgQZQ unsplash
Sender beware – how private are digital workplace conversations?
Following on from the recent Official Information Act request for correspondence between Ministry of Justice employees, employees may be wondering how private their online conversations with colleague...
04.07.2024 Posted in Employment
Concrete pillars impressive
TCC confirms Slip Rule limits in Adjudications
The Technology and Construction Court (TCC) has confirmed the narrow parameters of the ‘slip rule’ in the UK, which allows adjudicators to amend their determination to correct for any clerical or ...
02.07.2024 Posted in Construction & Disputes
Scots rule standard notification clause was condition precedent
In a warning for contractors, a Scottish Court has ruled that a standard form notification clause was a condition precedent to recovering time-related costs (TRCs) (FES Ltd v HFD Construction Group Lt...
01.07.2024 Posted in Construction
rape blossom
Anticipatory Repudiatory Breach and the Date of Default: Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest
The decision in Ayhan Sezer v Agroinvest [2024] EWHC 479 (Comm) clarifies that where there has been an anticipatory repudiatory breach of contract, the “date of default” is the date of the breach ...
25.06.2024 Posted in Trade and Transport
My cross-lease neighbour wants me to consent to their extension. Can I refuse?
From time to time a cross-lease property owner may be asked by their cross-lease neighbour for their consent to specific matters, such as proposed structural alterations or additions to their neighbou...
25.06.2024 Posted in Property
Contract stock edit
I have a land covenant (or an easement) registered on my title that restricts the use of my land. Can I get this removed?
Where land is subject to covenants and easements, owners might find themselves in a position where they are unintentionally or unknowingly in breach of a covenant or easement or have purchased land th...
25.06.2024 Posted in Property
SEND AN ENQUIRY
Send us an enquiry

For expert legal advice, please complete the form below or call us on (09) 375 8700.